What are your thoughts about the new handicapped symbol?

Stacy Ellingen
Stacy Ellingen
@stacy-ellingen
10 years ago
34 posts

There has been a lot of talk online lately about the new 'handicapped' symbol. This article inDisability Scoopexplains that New York will be come to require the new symbol for all signs. The state will also change the wording on signs. Instead of using the word "handicapped," it will say "accessible." What are your thoughts on this? Is the new icon too disability specific? Should it have incorporated a broader spectrum of disabilities? Do you think Wisconsin will pass a bill requiring this?

In First, State Adopts Updated Handicapped Symbol

By


An effort to adopt a more in-motion symbol for accessibility is gaining traction with New York requiring all new signage in the state to utilize the

An effort to adopt a more in-motion symbol for accessibility is gaining traction with New York requiring all new signage in the state to utilize the Accessible Icon. (Accessible Icon Project)

A revamped version of the blue and white icon thats long symbolized accessibility everywhere from parking lots to restrooms will soon be commonplace in more communities.

Under a bill signed late last week, New York will be come the first state to require all new and replacement signage used to signify accessibility for people with disabilities to include a more active, in-motion image of a person using a wheelchair.

The state will also change the terminology on such signs, employing the word accessible instead of handicapped.

The shift is about more than aesthetics, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said in signing the legislation.

This bill is an important step toward correcting societys understanding of accessibility and eliminating a stigma, Cuomo said.

New York City and a smattering of other localities, businesses and schools havealreadyagreed to adopt the revamped symbol, known as the Accessible Icon, which first gained momentum through a grassroots effort in Boston.

Whats more, the icon is currently ondisplayat the Museum of Modern Art in New York City as part of an exhibit of culturally-relevant designs developed in recent decades.


updated by @stacy-ellingen: 02/23/16 03:06:02AM
Wanda Viellieux
Wanda Viellieux
@wanda-viellieux
10 years ago
22 posts

I have mixed thoughts and feelings on this one. Ok, let me post my hesitant thoughts first. then my postivie thoughts about this change.

I can see able bodied people being perplexed about the new symbol but even more so the word "Accessible" being a problem for them. Many able bodied people disregard the disabled parkling now, it's going to be worse, because the image and wording will be further away from the intent of the marked parking spaces. I'm not talking everybody, just about what I see in everyday life in my town. Now some people might not recognize that this is a motion image, and it may confuse them. How are you going to educate all of them when we are still trying to educate them on things for years and still trying?

Ok now on to the positive...............I think change is great, provided the change is clear to ALL people, not just people who need to use the parking spaces. I do think that the signs could be changed to reflect our whole personhood. However, I wonder if this is the right change.

Phoebe Hefko
Phoebe Hefko
@phoebe-hefko
10 years ago
1 posts
Wanda brings up a good point: there is a need to make changes in accessibility and awareness on a broader scale, moreso than to second-guess ourselves over a particular symbol or word choice. That being said, I don't feel we would lose clarity by substituting the "in motion" symbol. It is well designed and easily recognizable. A symbol like that one needs to convey its message in a split second. And continued use of the word "handicapped" in public places leads people outside our field to think this is still an accepted term.

Tags

Dislike 0